FRE · Rule 106
FRE Rule 106 addresses the rule of completeness, allowing a party to introduce additional parts of a statement to provide context.
Source: FRE Rule 106
When a writing or recorded statement or part thereof is introduced by a party, an adverse party may require the introduction, at that time, of any other part or any other writing or recorded statement that in fairness ought to be considered contemporaneously with it.
FRE Rule 106 is known as the rule of completeness. It allows a party to present additional portions of a document or recording if the initial presentation would be misleading without the context of those additional parts.
The rule seeks to prevent the misleading presentation of evidence by allowing relevant context to be considered. It promotes fairness during the trial by ensuring that information is not taken out of context.
If a party introduces part of a document or statement, the opposing party can require the introduction of additional parts to provide necessary context.
The court emphasized the necessity of presenting parts of statements to prevent distortion, underscoring the application of the rule in trials.
Rule 106 can appear in exam questions in the context of evidentiary challenges, commonly regarding the completeness of documents or statements. Pay attention to whether the presentation of evidence could mislead the jury.