FRCP/Discovery

Rule 34: Producing Documents and Tangible Things

Quick Answer

What is Producing Documents and Tangible Things?

Rule 34 allows parties to demand that other parties hand over documents, electronically stored information (ESI), and tangible things relevant to the case. It also permits entry onto property for inspection or testing. This is one of the most frequently used discovery tools.

Source: Fed. R. Civ. P. 34

Plain English Explanation

Rule 34 allows parties to demand that other parties hand over documents, electronically stored information (ESI), and tangible things relevant to the case. It also permits entry onto property for inspection or testing. This is one of the most frequently used discovery tools.

Requests must describe the items sought with reasonable particularity. The responding party has 30 days to respond and must either produce the documents or state objections with specificity. Importantly, the responding party must state whether any responsive documents are being withheld based on an objection — you cannot simply object and stay silent about whether documents exist.

Documents must be produced either as kept in the ordinary course of business or organized and labeled to correspond with the categories in the request. For electronically stored information, the 2006 amendments added specific provisions: ESI must be produced in the form requested or, if no form is specified, in a reasonably usable form. The producing party need not produce ESI from sources that are not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost, though the court may still order production for good cause.

Key Points

  1. 1Requests must describe items with reasonable particularity
  2. 2Response due within 30 days; must state whether documents are withheld based on objections
  3. 3Documents produced as kept in ordinary course or organized and labeled by request category
  4. 4ESI produced in requested form or a reasonably usable form
  5. 5Not reasonably accessible ESI need not be produced absent good cause

Common Exam Issues

  • E-discovery obligations and the concept of not reasonably accessible ESI
  • Duty to preserve electronically stored information (litigation hold obligations)
  • Whether objections are sufficient or result in waiver
  • Producing documents in the form kept in ordinary course vs. organized by request

Important Cases

Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC, 220 F.R.D. 212 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

Peskoff v. Faber, 251 F.R.D. 59 (D.D.C. 2008)

Hyles v. New York City, 2016 WL 4077114 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

Related Rules

Master Civil Procedure with AI-Powered Study Tools

20+ tools to help you study smarter. 3-day free trial, then $9.99/month.

Start Free Trial