Article X — Contents of Writings, Recordings, and Photographs
Rule 1002: Requirement of the Original
What is Requirement of the Original?
Rule 1002 states the Best Evidence Rule (more accurately called the Original Document Rule): when the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph are at issue, the original must be produced. You cannot testify about what a document says without producing the document itself.
Source: Fed. R. Evid. 1002
Rule Text
An original writing, recording, or photograph is required in order to prove its content unless these rules or a federal statute provides otherwise.
Plain English Explanation
Rule 1002 states the Best Evidence Rule (more accurately called the Original Document Rule): when the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph are at issue, the original must be produced. You cannot testify about what a document says without producing the document itself.
The rule's trigger is crucial — it only applies when the proponent is trying to prove the contents of the document. If a witness has independent knowledge of a fact and can testify from personal knowledge, the witness can do so even if the same information happens to be contained in a document. The rule applies when the testimony is essentially about what the document says, such as the terms of a contract, the contents of a letter, or what is depicted in a photograph.
The rule exists because when the contents of a document matter, small details of wording can be critical. Human memory is unreliable for exact wording, and the risk of error in describing contents from memory is too high. Requiring the original ensures the fact-finder can see the exact language for themselves. However, the rule has numerous exceptions in Rules 1003-1007, and in practice it is relatively easy to satisfy or avoid.
Key Points
- 1The Best Evidence Rule: to prove the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph, the original is required
- 2The rule only applies when the contents of the document are being proved — not when a witness testifies from personal knowledge
- 3Key trigger: is the witness testifying about what the document says, or about independently known facts?
- 4The rule aims to prevent errors from relying on memory about document contents
- 5Numerous exceptions exist in Rules 1003-1007
Common Exam Issues
- Determining whether the proponent is trying to prove the contents of a writing (rule applies) or testifying from personal knowledge (rule does not apply)
- The distinction between facts that happen to be in documents and testimony about the documents themselves
- Legally operative documents — contracts, wills, deeds — where the writing IS the fact, making the original essential
Landmark Cases
- Meyers v. United States
- Seiler v. Lucasfilm, Ltd.
Article X — Contents of Writings, Recordings, and Photographs
This rule is part of Article X — Contents of Writings, Recordings, and Photographs of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
Browse All FRE RulesMaster Evidence Law with AI-Powered Study Tools
20+ tools to help you study smarter. 3-day free trial, then $9.99/month.
Start Free Trial