Article VII — Opinions and Expert Testimony
Rule 706: Court-Appointed Expert Witnesses
What is Court-Appointed Expert Witnesses?
Rule 706 gives the trial judge the power to appoint a neutral expert witness, independent of the parties. This authority addresses the 'battle of the experts' problem, where each side hires experts who predictably support the position of the party paying them. A court-appointed expert can provide independent analysis to help the jury evaluate competing expert claims.
Source: Fed. R. Evid. 706
Rule Text
On a party's motion or on its own, the court may order the parties to show cause why expert witnesses should not be appointed and may ask the parties to submit nominations. The court may appoint any expert that the parties agree on and any of its own choosing. The court must inform the expert of the expert's duties and may do so in writing with a copy to the parties. The expert must advise the parties of any findings, may be deposed, must testify if called, and may be cross-examined by any party. The expert is entitled to reasonable compensation, and in a civil case the court may apportion costs among the parties. The court must, upon request, inform the jury that the court appointed the expert. A party may call its own expert witnesses at its own expense.
Plain English Explanation
Rule 706 gives the trial judge the power to appoint a neutral expert witness, independent of the parties. This authority addresses the 'battle of the experts' problem, where each side hires experts who predictably support the position of the party paying them. A court-appointed expert can provide independent analysis to help the jury evaluate competing expert claims.
The court can appoint an expert on its own initiative or at a party's request. The appointed expert must disclose findings to both sides, can be deposed, must testify if called, and can be cross-examined by any party. The jury must be told, upon request, that the expert was appointed by the court — this disclosure often gives the court-appointed expert's testimony extra credibility.
In practice, courts rarely use Rule 706, but the threat of appointment can encourage parties to present more balanced and credible expert testimony. The parties retain the right to call their own experts regardless of whether the court appoints one. The costs of the court-appointed expert are generally split among the parties in civil cases, while in criminal cases the costs are paid by the government.
Key Points
- 1The court may appoint its own expert witness to provide independent analysis
- 2The court-appointed expert must disclose findings, submit to deposition, testify, and be subject to cross-examination
- 3The jury must be informed of the court appointment upon request
- 4Parties retain the right to call their own experts in addition to the court's expert
- 5Costs are apportioned among the parties in civil cases; the government pays in criminal cases
Common Exam Issues
- When court appointment of an expert is appropriate — complex scientific or technical issues with dueling experts
- The enhanced credibility of court-appointed experts and whether this creates unfair weight
- Whether the judge's decision to appoint (or not appoint) an expert is reviewable on appeal
Landmark Cases
- Hall v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.
Article VII — Opinions and Expert Testimony
This rule is part of Article VII — Opinions and Expert Testimony of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
Browse All FRE RulesMaster Evidence Law with AI-Powered Study Tools
20+ tools to help you study smarter. 3-day free trial, then $9.99/month.
Start Free Trial