Curia Advisari Vult
Literal meaning: “The court wishes to be advised”
What does the Latin term "Curia Advisari Vult" mean in law?
Curia advisari vult, commonly abbreviated as cur. adv. vult or C.A.V., is a notation indicating that the court has reserved judgment and will deliver its decision at a later date after further deliberation. When a court marks a case C.A.V., it signals that the issues are sufficiently complex that the judges need additional time to consider the arguments, review authorities, and draft an opinion. The notation appears in court records and case reports to indicate the interval between the conclusion of oral arguments and the delivery of the judgment. It is commonly encountered in appellate courts and is a standard feature of legal reporting in common law jurisdictions, particularly in England, Australia, and other Commonwealth countries.
Source: Procedure · Legal Latin
Legal Definition
Curia advisari vult, commonly abbreviated as cur. adv. vult or C.A.V., is a notation indicating that the court has reserved judgment and will deliver its decision at a later date after further deliberation. When a court marks a case C.A.V., it signals that the issues are sufficiently complex that the judges need additional time to consider the arguments, review authorities, and draft an opinion. The notation appears in court records and case reports to indicate the interval between the conclusion of oral arguments and the delivery of the judgment. It is commonly encountered in appellate courts and is a standard feature of legal reporting in common law jurisdictions, particularly in England, Australia, and other Commonwealth countries.
How It's Used
Appellate courts use this notation when they decide not to deliver judgment immediately after hearing arguments. The C.A.V. notation in published case reports signals to readers that the court took the case under advisement and that the written opinion was the product of extended deliberation rather than an immediate bench ruling.
Example Sentences
After three days of oral argument, the court noted curia advisari vult and scheduled the judgment for delivery the following month.
The case report indicated C.A.V. on November 15, with judgment ultimately delivered on January 22, reflecting the complexity of the constitutional issues involved.
When the appellate panel announced curia advisari vult, both counsel understood that a decision would not be rendered from the bench that day.