civil procedure · procedure
A Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV) is a judicial ruling that nullifies the jury's decision when the judge believes that no reasonable jury could have reached the same conclusion based on the evidence presented. It is typically sought after a jury trial and can only be granted when one party believes the verdict lacks a legally sufficient evidentiary basis.
A specific verdict rendered by the jury in the case must exist, typically reflecting a resolution of the issues presented.
What to prove: The jury reached a verdict that is contrary to the evidence or law applicable in the case.
The evidence presented at trial must be analyzed to determine if it coherently supports the claimed verdict.
What to prove: The moving party must demonstrate that, viewing all evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, there is insufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict.
The court must apply the correct legal standards that govern the claims in the case.
What to prove: The JNOV applicant must show that the jury's verdict is inconsistent with the applicable legal standards or misapplication of law.
The burden of proof lies with the party moving for JNOV, and the standard is typically 'clear and convincing evidence' or 'beyond a reasonable doubt' depending on jurisdiction.
In exams, focus on the interplay between jury findings and legal standards when discussing JNOV. Be prepared to evaluate scenarios where evidence may lead to a JNOV.