Can A Party Negligence Per Se in Torts?

Yes, a party can be found liable for negligence per se if they violate a statute designed to protect a particular class of individuals from harm. This legal doctrine establishes that an automatic breach of duty exists when a law is violated.

Negligence per se arises when a defendant's conduct violates a statute or regulation that is intended to protect a specific group from harm. In such instances, the breach of the statute can automatically establish the breach of duty element of negligence. The plaintiff must show that they belong to the class of persons intended to be protected by the statute and that the harm suffered was the type that the statute was designed to prevent.

Key considerations include whether the statute is a safety regulation and whether the defendant's violation caused the plaintiff's injury. Courts often reference whether the statute reflects a legislative intent to provide safety, using it to establish the standard of care in negligence cases. For instance, if a motorist violates a traffic law designed to prevent accidents and causes injury to a pedestrian, that violation could serve as negligence per se.

Moreover, courts may also consider if the violation was reasonable under the circumstances. Some jurisdictions adhere to a strict interpretation that no further inquiry into the reasonableness of care is necessary if the statute is clearly intended to protect the class of persons harmed. Other jurisdictions may allow some discretion, particularly if the defendant’s actions arguably fell within an exemption or if compliance with the statute would have been impossible under the circumstances.

Examples of common statutes involved in negligence per se cases include traffic regulations, health codes, or environmental protection laws. Notably, proving negligence per se simplifies litigation for the plaintiff by removing the need to establish the standard of care since that standard is directly sourced from the relevant statute.

• 1Martin v. Herzog (1920) - Established that violation of a statute can be considered negligence per se.
• 2Tomaine v. McDonough (2015) - Discussed the criteria necessary for a statute to establish a standard of care.
• 3Gordon v. City of New York (1968) - Addressed the issue of whether compliance with the law may serve as a defense.
• 4Parker v. Mobil Oil Corp. (2006) - Examined applicability of negligence per se in cases of administrative regulation violations.

• what-is-the-standard-of-care-in-negligence
• how-to-prove-negligence-in-tort-law
• what-are-the-elements-of-negligence