Contracts · Assignment

How Does Assignment in Contracts?

Clear answer to: How Does Assignment in Contracts? with key cases, examples, and exam tips for law students.

Short Answer

Assignment in contracts refers to the transfer of rights and benefits under a contract from one party to another. It is allowed unless restricted by the contract itself or prohibited by law.

Detailed Answer

In contract law, assignment is the process by which a party (the assignor) transfers its rights and benefits under a contract to a third party (the assignee). The assignor remains responsible for the obligations of the contract unless a novation occurs, wherein both parties agree to substitute the assignee for the assignor. While assignments are generally permissible, they can be restricted by specific prohibitions in the contract or by the nature of the rights involved, such as in contracts involving personal services.

In determining the validity of an assignment, courts will typically assess whether the assignment meets the requirements of the original contract and whether it contravenes public policy. Notably, an assignment that materially changes the duties or obligations of the obligor may not be enforceable. For instance, if the performance of the contract requires unique skills, the obligor may have the right to refuse assignment.

Certain rules govern the assignment of rights, including the necessity for consideration, unless the assignment is executed in writing. Furthermore, the assignment must be clearly communicated to the obligor to be effective. The obligor does not have the right to transfer their duty under the contract without consent, which means that although a right can be assigned, the obligation may still remain with the original party unless it is expressly discharged.

Key considerations in assignments include whether an assignment is absolute or conditional, the effect of notice of assignment on the original parties, and potential defenses available to the obligor against the assignee. Understanding these nuances helps clarify the intricate workings of contractual relationships and can influence decisions in both litigation and transactional settings.

Key Cases
  • 1Hawkins v. McGee (1929) - Established principles of performance and assignment in contracts.
  • 2Cohen v. Wadsworth (1984) - Clarified the rules regarding the assignment of contractual rights.
  • 3Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores (1965) - Discussed the enforceability of assignments in unique contracts.
  • 4Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G.W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co. (1968) - Addressed the conditions under which assignments are permissible.
Practical Example

Imagine a contractor is hired to build a house. The contractor can assign the right to receive payment from the homeowner to a subcontractor. The homeowner must be informed of this assignment so that the subcontractor can legally claim the payment upon the project's completion.

Exam Relevance

Assignments frequently appear on law school exams, focusing on the rules governing the validity of assignments, the rights of the parties involved, and potential defenses. Students should be prepared to analyze cases involving assignment issues and apply relevant legal principles.

Get Answers to All Your Legal Questions

Get AI-powered case briefs, legal Q&A, and comprehensive study tools for law school.