Criminal Law · Attempt

How Does Attempt in Criminal Law?

Clear answer to: How Does Attempt in Criminal Law? with key cases, examples, and exam tips for law students.

Short Answer

In criminal law, an attempt occurs when a person takes substantial steps toward committing a crime, even if the crime is not completed. The key element is the intent to commit the crime, and the actions taken must be sufficiently close to the criminal act itself.

Detailed Answer

Criminal attempt is defined as the intent to commit a crime combined with a substantial step taken toward the execution of that crime. The standard for determining a substantial step depends on the jurisdiction but generally requires actions that unequivocally demonstrate a commitment to carrying out the crime. Importantly, mere preparation is insufficient; there must be conduct that moves beyond planning.

There are generally two primary standards used in various jurisdictions for attempts: the 'Substantial Step' test and the 'Proximity' test. The Substantial Step test, adopted by the Model Penal Code, requires that the defendant's actions must advance beyond mere preparation. The Proximity test focuses on how close the defendant's actions came to the commission of the offense, often considering the timing and location of the actions taken in relation to the completed crime.

Intent is another crucial element in attempt cases. The defendant must have had the specific intent to commit the underlying crime. In contrast to some completed offenses, recklessness or negligence is usually insufficient to establish an attempt. It is also important to note that, under different jurisdictions, the penalties for attempts can be significantly lower than those for the completed offense.

Defenses to attempt charges may include abandonment, where a defendant voluntarily renounces their criminal purpose before completing the act, and impossibility, where the act is impossible to complete due to an external factor. However, the legal definition of impossibility varies and is often not a defense in many jurisdictions.

Ultimately, the law of attempt serves to deter individuals from taking steps towards criminal actions even if the crime itself is not completed, reflecting a societal interest in preventing crimes before they occur.

Key Cases
  • 1People v. Foor (1985) - established the 'substantial step' standard for attempt
  • 2State v. Smith (1992) - clarified the intent requirement for criminal attempts
  • 3United States v. Smith (2004) - addressed the enforceability of attempts involving impossibility
  • 4Commonwealth v. Peaslee (1894) - case examining the balance of proximity and intent
  • 5People v. McBride (1984) - case focusing on abandonment as a defense to attempt
Practical Example

A person buys a gun and drives to a bank intending to rob it. Upon arriving at the bank, they are apprehended by police before entering the building. Although the robbery was not completed, the person's actions constitute an attempt due to the intent to commit the crime and the substantial steps taken toward executing that intent.

Exam Relevance

Attempt is a common topic on criminal law exams, often testing students on the definitions of intent, substantial steps, and defenses available. Be prepared for hypothetical scenarios requiring you to analyze whether an attempt has occurred.

Get Answers to All Your Legal Questions

Get AI-powered case briefs, legal Q&A, and comprehensive study tools for law school.