Criminal Law · Attempt

How To Analyze Attempt in Criminal Law?

Clear answer to: How To Analyze Attempt in Criminal Law? with key cases, examples, and exam tips for law students.

Short Answer

To analyze attempt in criminal law, determine whether the accused had the intent to commit the crime and whether their actions constituted a substantial step towards completing the crime, rather than mere preparation.

Detailed Answer

In criminal law, the concept of attempt requires the defendant to possess a specific intent to commit a particular crime. This intent is generally demonstrated by the defendant's actions leading up to the offense. It is crucial to understand that mere preparation is insufficient; the actions must constitute a substantial step toward the commission of the crime, indicating that the defendant's focus was on completing the criminal objective.

To analyze a potential attempt, you should first ascertain the required mental state or mens rea for the completed crime. For instance, if the underlying offense requires intent, the same intent must be evident in the attempt. Following this, conduct a thorough examination of the defendant's actions. Most jurisdictions utilize the 'substantial step' standard which emphasizes that the actions taken must show a direct movement towards the completion of the crime, going beyond mere preparation.

In assessing attempts, courts apply various tests such as the 'probable desistance' test or the 'unequivocality' test, which help determine if a reasonable observer would conclude that the defendant was merely preparing or actually trying to commit the crime. The distinction between preparation and a substantial step is often a pivotal aspect in attempt cases.

Significant defenses against attempted crimes include abandonment and impossibility. Abandonment requires the defendant to voluntarily and completely renounce their criminal purpose, while impossibility negates liability if the defendant could not possibly have committed the crime due to factual circumstances. Both defenses can significantly influence the outcome of an attempt analysis.

Key Cases
  • 1People v. Rizzo (1927) - established the idea of a substantial step towards the commission of a crime.
  • 2State v. Smith (1987) - discussed the importance of intent in determining attempts.
  • 3United States v. Jackson (1994) - addressed the criteria for evaluating the actions constituting an attempt.
Practical Example

Suppose a person buys a loaded gun and approaches an individual intending to shoot, but at the last moment, they decide not to pull the trigger. Here, the person has taken a substantial step towards commission of the crime, fulfilling the attempt requirement as their actions illustrate both intent and a direct effort to commit the act.

Exam Relevance

Attempt is frequently tested on law school exams as it requires understanding both the mental and physical components needed to establish liability, often as part of broader discussions on inchoate crimes.

Get Answers to All Your Legal Questions

Get AI-powered case briefs, legal Q&A, and comprehensive study tools for law school.