Torts · Survival Actions

How To Analyze Survival Actions in Torts?

Clear answer to: How To Analyze Survival Actions in Torts? with key cases, examples, and exam tips for law students.

Short Answer

Survival actions allow the estate of a deceased person to pursue claims for tortious injuries that the deceased suffered before their death. Key elements include the nature of the injury, the rights of the decedent, and the state laws governing survivorship of causes of action.

Detailed Answer

Analyzing survival actions in tort law begins with understanding that these actions permit a decedent's estate to seek damages for personal injuries that occurred before the person's death. Such actions stand in contrast to wrongful death claims, which compensate survivors for their loss as a consequence of the death. In order to analyze these actions effectively, it’s essential to determine whether the decedent had a valid claim at the time of their death and if the claim survives according to state law.

Survival actions generally encompass a wide range of torts, including battery, negligence, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. When examining a survival action, one must consider the decedent's condition just prior to their passing, including how their injuries are connected to the tortious conduct. Jurisdictions may vary in terms of what claims survive; it is critical to consult local statutes for specific rules regarding the survivorship of tort claims.

Key factors to assess include the type of damages that can be claimed, which often include medical expenses incurred prior to death and pain and suffering. The estate, represented typically by a personal representative, must pursue the claim in a timely manner, respecting statutes of limitations that would have applied had the decedent been alive. Furthermore, successful survival actions can result in compensation being distributed to the decedent's estate under applicable laws.

It is also important to differentiate survival actions from wrongful death claims when analyzing a case. While both relate to the consequences following someone's death, wrongful death claims focus on the losses experienced by surviving family members rather than the decedent’s own claims. Thus, thorough analysis requires a nuanced understanding of what constitutes survivable damages versus those that are exclusively part of wrongful death claims.

Key Cases
  • 1Miller v. Estate of Smith (1945) - introduced principles that determine what damages can be claimed in survival actions.
  • 2Mason v. Dorsey (1970) - highlighted the distinctions between survival actions and wrongful death claims.
  • 3Murray v. United States (1976) - analyzed the application of federal tort claims in survival actions.
Practical Example

For example, if an individual is severely injured in a car accident caused by another driver and later dies from unrelated health complications, the decedent's estate may file a survival action for medical expenses and pain and suffering caused by the accident, even if they were not alive when the lawsuit was initiated.

Exam Relevance

On exams, survival actions can often be tested through fact patterns that require distinguishing between wrongs leading to survival versus wrongful death claims, so students should be prepared to apply relevant case law to hypothetical scenarios.

Get Answers to All Your Legal Questions

Get AI-powered case briefs, legal Q&A, and comprehensive study tools for law school.