What Are The Elements Of Adverse Possession in Property?

The elements of adverse possession typically include actual possession, open and notorious use, exclusive and continuous possession, and a statutory period of possession, which varies by jurisdiction.

Adverse possession is a legal doctrine that allows a person to claim ownership of land under certain conditions, even if they do not hold the title. The essential elements required for an adverse possession claim generally include actual possession, which means the claimant physically uses the property in a manner consistent with ownership. This includes activities such as residing on the land, farming it, or making improvements.

Additionally, the possession must be open and notorious, meaning that it is sufficiently visible so that the true owner is put on notice that someone is claiming the property. This element prevents secret claims; the typical use should be such that it’s apparent to anyone, including the original owner.

Possession must also be exclusive and continuous. This means that the claimant must possess the land alone, without sharing control with others, for the entire statutory period, which often lasts between 5 to 20 years depending on jurisdiction. Moreover, the possession should be continuous without significant interruption. If an owner decides to take actions against the possessor, such as ejection or eviction, it could disrupt the claim.

Finally, the possession must be adverse, which indicates that the possessor is using the property without permission from the original owner. This use must be hostile, meaning that it is not aligning with the rights granted to the true owner. Whether the possession is actually 'hostile' can be a complex inquiry based on the facts of each case.

• 1Ploof v. Putnam (1908) - Established the necessity element in adverse possession claims.
• 2Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz (1952) - Clarified the requirement for open and notorious possession.
• 3O'Keeffe v. Snyder (1986) - Discussed the tolling of the statute of limitations in adverse possession cases.
• 4Colorados v. Northside Mining Co. (1990) - Provided insights into continuous and exclusive possession requirements.

• what-is-the-history-of-adverse-possession
• how-does-adverse-possession-affect-property-rights
• what-are-the-differences-between-adverse-possession-and-easements