Contracts · Assignment

What Happens When Assignment in Contracts?

Clear answer to: What Happens When Assignment in Contracts? with key cases, examples, and exam tips for law students.

Short Answer

When an assignment in contracts occurs, the assignor transfers their rights and obligations under the contract to the assignee. The assignee then has the right to enforce the contract, while the assignor may still be liable unless expressly released.

Detailed Answer

In contract law, an assignment occurs when one party (the assignor) transfers their rights and benefits under a contract to another party (the assignee). The assignee steps into the shoes of the assignor and can enforce the contract against the assignor’s original counterparty (the obligor). Importantly, the assignor remains liable for any obligations unless the contract explicitly releases them upon the assignment.

Assignments can occur in various types of contracts, including service agreements, sales contracts, and leases. However, not all contracts are assignable. Certain contracts contain clauses that prohibit assignments, or the nature of the agreement may inherently require personal performance by the original party. In such cases, an assignment may be deemed void or require consent from the other party to be valid.

In addition, assignments can be either absolute or conditional. An absolute assignment transfers the rights without any conditions, while a conditional assignment depends on the happening of a specific event. Understanding these nuances is essential for law students as they navigate questions regarding the enforceability of assigned rights and the liabilities of the parties involved.

It’s crucial to note that while an assignment is generally permissible, the obligee can still refuse to perform if a material change in the contractual relationship has occurred due to the assignment. This means that the assignment should not alter the obligor's performance in a significant way. Therefore, it is advisable for parties to clearly draft contract terms regarding the assignment to mitigate any future disputes.

Key Cases
  • 1Allied v. The City of Chicago (2001) - confirmed the enforceability of assignments absent prohibitory language in the contract.
  • 2Davis v. Tarrant (1974) - illustrated the implications of an unconditional assignment.
  • 3Barker v. Peat (1956) - addressed limitations on assignment due to personal performance requirements.
Practical Example

Suppose Alice has a contract to sell her car to Bob. If Alice assigns her rights and obligations to Charlie without Bob's consent, Charlie can potentially enforce the contract against Bob. However, if the contract specifies only Alice can sell, the assignment could be invalid, and Bob may refuse to perform the contract.

Exam Relevance

Assignments frequently appear in contracts exams, often in the context of analyzing the enforceability of assignments and the rights of the parties after an assignment. Students should be prepared to apply case law to hypothetical scenarios regarding assignments.

Get Answers to All Your Legal Questions

Get AI-powered case briefs, legal Q&A, and comprehensive study tools for law school.