What Happens When State Action in Constitutional Law?

State action refers to actions taken by government bodies and officials that are subject to constitutional scrutiny. When state action occurs, it can trigger the application of constitutional protections, ensuring that rights like due process and equal protection are upheld.

In constitutional law, 'state action' refers to actions by government entities or officials, as opposed to private individuals. The significance of state action is critical in determining whether constitutional protections, such as those found in the Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment, apply to a particular situation. Generally, private conduct does not constitute state action and is not subject to constitutional limitations. Courts have used tests to analyze whether an action qualifies as state action, focusing on criteria such as government involvement or endorsement of private conduct.

The landmark case of *Shelley v. Kraemer* (1948) illustrates the importance of state action. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that racially restrictive covenants, though private agreements, could not be enforced by the state courts, highlighting that state involvement in enforcing the agreement constituted state action. Similarly, in *Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association* (2001), the Court found that a private athletic association was so entwined with state functions that its actions constituted state action, making it subject to constitutional scrutiny.

Determining when state action exists is essential in various contexts, including voting rights, education, and public accommodations. The 'nexus' or entanglement test is often applied to scrutinize the relationship between private conduct and state authority. Additionally, the 'public function' doctrine, which indicates that certain private entities are performing a public function, can also be invoked to establish state action.

It is important to note that while certain private actions can be deemed state actions, the threshold for establishing state action is quite specific. In *National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Tarkanian* (1990), for instance, the lack of sufficient state action shielded the NCAA from constitutional claims, indicating a limitation on the application of constitutional provisions to private entities.

In conclusion, state action is a crucial concept in constitutional law as it delineates the boundary of constitutional protections. When state action is established, it sets in motion constitutional considerations and the associated checks and balances aimed at protecting individual rights.

• 1Shelley v. Kraemer (1948) - Determined that state courts could not enforce racially restrictive covenants, establishing the link between state action and constitutional protection.
• 2Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association (2001) - Found that a private organization performed a public function, thus its actions were subject to constitutional scrutiny.
• 3National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Tarkanian (1990) - Clarified limits on establishing state action regarding private organizations.
• 4Marsh v. Alabama (1946) - Held that a private company town could not prohibit free expression on its streets due to state action through local enforcement.
• 5Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. (1974) - Addressed the relationship between public utility companies and state action in the context of due process.

• understanding-state-action-doctrine
• private-vs-public-entity-state-action
• state-action-and-the-fourteenth-amendment