What Is Joinder in Civil Procedure?

Joinder is a procedural mechanism that allows multiple parties or claims to be joined in a single lawsuit to promote judicial efficiency and resolve related issues in one case. It encompasses both permissive joinder and compulsory joinder rules.

Joinder in civil procedure refers to the process of including additional parties or claims in an ongoing lawsuit. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, particularly Rule 20, multiple plaintiffs or defendants may be joined if there is a common question of law or fact that arises out of the same transaction or occurrence. This helps in consolidating cases and minimizing the potential for conflicting judgments, which promotes judicial economy.

Permissive joinder allows parties to join voluntarily, while compulsory joinder (Rule 19) mandates the inclusion of a party when their absence would prejudice their interest or the existing parties. Furthermore, it also discusses situations where a case can proceed without an absent party if their participation can be effectively resolved in their absence, striking a balance between judicial efficiency and the parties' rights.

Joinder does not just pertain to entities but also extends to claims through Rule 18, where a plaintiff can bring multiple claims against a defendant. This allows a plaintiff to present all claims arising from the same set of facts, eliminating the need for multiple lawsuits and effectively streamlining the litigation process.

However, joinder raises issues of subject matter jurisdiction, especially when federal and state law claims are involved. Courts must ensure that the inclusion of additional parties does not destroy jurisdiction by eliminating diversity or violating federal question jurisdiction assumptions.

In practical terms, joinder is crucial for civil litigation as it fosters comprehensive adjudication, reduces the risk of inconsistent verdicts, and facilitates judicial efficiency by addressing all claims and parties related to a particular dispute simultaneously.

• 1United States v. State of Minnesota (2012) - established the principles of compulsory joinder concerning indispensable parties.
• 2Rule 20 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1938) - codifies permissive joinder of parties.
• 3Owens v. PaineWebber, Inc. (1996) - clarified when claims could be asserted against multiple defendants.
• 4Cohen v. W.A. Foote Memorial Hospital (2001) - addressed issues surrounding permissive joinder in medical malpractice cases.

• what-is-permissive-joinder
• what-is-compulsory-joinder
• how-to-join-parties-in-civil-litigation