Contracts · Assignment

What Is The Difference Between Assignment in Contracts?

Clear answer to: What Is The Difference Between Assignment in Contracts? with key cases, examples, and exam tips for law students.

Short Answer

In contract law, an assignment refers to the transfer of rights or benefits under a contract from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee). The key difference between types of assignments can involve whether they are absolute or conditional and the effect of the assignment on the obligor's responsibilities.

Detailed Answer

In contract law, assignments can be classified into several types, primarily absolute assignments and conditional assignments. An absolute assignment involves a complete transfer of rights from the assignor to the assignee, where the assignor retains no future claims over the assigned rights. This makes the assignee the sole party entitled to the benefits under the contract. On the other hand, a conditional assignment may specify that certain conditions must be met for the assignment to be effective, allowing the assignor to retain some control over the rights involved.

Additionally, when discussing assignments, it's crucial to consider the impact on the obligor, the party responsible for fulfilling the contractual obligation. An assignment does not typically alter the obligations of the obligor unless they consent to the assignment. Therefore, the assignor remains liable to the obligor for performance, while the assignee merely gains a right to receive the benefit of the contract.

Moreover, not all contracts are assignable; contracts involving personal services, for instance, may include clauses that expressly prohibit assignment. Courts have upheld these clauses, emphasizing the idea that certain relationships cannot be delegated without the consent of the other party, which speaks to the principle of privity of contract.

Key defenses against assignment can arise if the obligor was not notified of the assignment or if the assignment violates terms of the original contract. Understanding these nuances is vital in legal practice, as problematic assignments can lead to disputes over enforceability or liabilities among the parties involved.

Key Cases
  • 1Mckinney v. Nat’l City Bank (1917) - Established the significance of assignment and obligor consent.
  • 2E. R. Squibb & Sons v. E. R. Squibb Manufacturing Corp. (2011) - Addressed limitations on assignments in contracts involving personal services.
  • 3In re A.C. O., Inc. (1934) - Explored the nature of rights that can be assigned and enforcement.
  • 4Hoffman v. Board of Education (1989) - Discussed the implications of assignment on obligations and rights within contracts.
Practical Example

Consider a freelance graphic designer (assignor) who has a contract with a startup company for a design project. The designer decides to assign the right to receive payment to a friend (assignee). In this absolute assignment, the startup company must pay the friend instead of the designer, while the original contract obligations remain unaffected unless the startup objects.

Exam Relevance

Assignments often appear in contracts exams, with questions focusing on the effects of assignment on rights and obligations, as well as limitations imposed by contract terms. Understanding the nuances of assignment is crucial for articulating analyses in hypothetical scenarios.

Get Answers to All Your Legal Questions

Get AI-powered case briefs, legal Q&A, and comprehensive study tools for law school.