Criminal Law · Felony Murder

What Is The Difference Between Felony Murder in Criminal Law?

Clear answer to: What Is The Difference Between Felony Murder in Criminal Law? with key cases, examples, and exam tips for law students.

Short Answer

Felony murder doctrine holds that a person can be charged with murder if a death occurs during the commission of a dangerous felony, regardless of intent. This differs from traditional murder where intent to kill or cause serious harm is necessary.

Detailed Answer

Felony murder is a legal doctrine that allows for a murder charge when a death occurs during the commission of certain felonies, even if the defendant did not intend to kill. This principle is rooted in the idea that engaging in inherently dangerous felony activities demonstrates a disregard for human life. Common felonies that trigger this doctrine include robbery, burglary, and arson, classified as enumerated felonies in many jurisdictions.

The critical distinction in felony murder cases is the lack of a need to prove malice aforethought or intent to kill, which is typically required for homicide charges. In felony murder prosecutions, the prosecution must only establish that a defendant was committing or attempting to commit a felony when the death occurred. This significantly raises the stakes for individuals involved in the commission of felonies, as they may face serious murder charges regardless of their actual intent to kill.

It is also important to distinguish between the types of felony murder; jurisdictions might adopt differing degrees of felony murder based on the seriousness of the felony committed. Some jurisdictions may classify it as first-degree murder by default for any inherently dangerous felony, while others may have varying penalties based on the degree of involvement or mental state of the actor.

Defenses against felony murder typically involve arguing that the individual was not engaged in a predicate felony at the time of the death or that the act was not committed in a dangerous manner. The collateral actions or responses of co-felons can also influence liability if a murder occurs during the ensuing chaos.

Key Cases
  • 1People v. McRoberts (1971) - recognized that during a felony like burglary, any killing associated can lead to murder charges regardless of intent.
  • 2State v. Sophophone (1992) - clarified the application of felony murder in relation to the defendant being an active participant in the felony.
  • 3R v. Smith (1964) - discussed the boundaries of liability in felony murder during the commission of an armed robbery.
Practical Example

If two individuals plan and execute a bank robbery, and during this robbery, one of them accidentally shoots a bystander, both can be charged with felony murder—regardless of the shooter’s intent to harm the bystander.

Exam Relevance

Exam questions frequently include hypotheticals involving felony murder, where students must analyze the elements of the underlying felony and the resulting death to assess liability.

Get Answers to All Your Legal Questions

Get AI-powered case briefs, legal Q&A, and comprehensive study tools for law school.