What Is The Test For Original Writing in Evidence?

The test for original writing in evidence revolves around demonstrating that the writing is an original document or a reliable duplicate, as defined under the Best Evidence Rule. This ensures the authenticity and integrity of the writing presented in court.

Under the Best Evidence Rule, original writings must be presented when the content of the writing is in dispute. An original writing is usually defined as the actual document itself, including any handwritten notes or drafts. In contrast, copies can only be used in limited circumstances where originals are unavailable, provided that they are exact duplicates and their authenticity is established.

Among the key distinctions is understanding what constitutes a 'duplicate'. Duplicates are not considered original unless they accurately reproduce the original document's contents. The party seeking to introduce a copy must demonstrate that the original has been lost or destroyed, or that it is otherwise unobtainable. In certain situations, a reliable witness can testify about the original document's content if the original is not available.

Significant case law emphasizes these principles. In *United States v. Boulware* (2008), the court held that a photocopy could be admitted if the party laid the proper foundation, indicating that the witness had personal knowledge of how the copy was made. Conversely, in *People v. McDaniel* (2006), the court ruled that the absence of the original document raised questions of reliability, warranting stricter scrutiny for the use of copies.

Overall, the principle underlying the test for original writing aims to protect the integrity of documentary evidence. Courts prefer originals to avoid disputes regarding authenticity and fidelity of the content. Legal practitioners must be diligent in ensuring that documents presented meet the requirements set forth under the relevant evidentiary rules.

• 1United States v. Boulware (2008) - Established conditions under which copies may be admitted.
• 2People v. McDaniel (2006) - Emphasized the necessity of original documents unless certain conditions are met.
• 3Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 1001 (1975) - Governs the definitions and requirements for original writings.
• 4Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Tully (1974) - Clarified the distinction between originals and duplicates.

• what-is-the-best-evidence-rule
• how-to-establish-authenticity-of-evidence
• what-are-the-differences-between-originals-and-duplicates-in-evidence