Contracts · Assignment

When Can Assignment in Contracts?

Clear answer to: When Can Assignment in Contracts? with key cases, examples, and exam tips for law students.

Short Answer

Assignments in contracts can generally occur unless expressly prohibited by the contract, or if the assignment materially alters the obligor's duty or increases their burden. In such cases, consent from the non-assigning party may be required.

Detailed Answer

In contract law, assignment refers to the transfer of rights or benefits from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee). Generally, assignments are permissible unless prohibited by the terms of the contract. For instance, many contracts explicitly state that assignments can only be made with consent from the other party, thereby ensuring that the non-assigning party does not face unexpected changes in their contractual obligations.

Additionally, assignments are typically not valid if they would materially change the duties owed by the obligor to the party to whom the obligation is owed. For example, if the nature of the goods or services being provided heavily relies on the unique skills of the original party, such as in a personal services contract, an assignment would not be permitted without consent.

Several exceptions exist where assignments are allowed despite contractual restrictions. For instance, rights to receive payment for goods or services are generally assignable even if the contract says otherwise. This aligns with the principle that the assignee steps into the shoes of the assignor, holding the same rights but not against any obligations that require consent.

In determining assignments, courts often consider public policy. Assignments that contravene public policy or statutory laws may be void or unenforceable, thus reflecting the underlying legal framework that governs the type of agreement in question. Finally, it is essential for parties to document assignments clearly to avoid potential disputes regarding rights and responsibilities.

Key Cases
  • 1Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. West (1974) - addressed enforceability of assignment despite contract prohibition.
  • 2Merritt v. McCaffrey (1952) - established criteria for valid assignments.
  • 3Assocs. Discount Corp. v. Wylie (1970) - addressed limitations on assignment related to commercial mortgaging.
  • 4Pope v. United States (1963) - highlighted limitations on enforceability concerning public policy.
Practical Example

Assume Alice has a lease agreement with Bob that prohibits subletting without Bob's consent. If Alice tries to assign her lease to Carol without obtaining Bob's consent, Bob can refuse to recognize the assignment, citing the express prohibition in the agreement. However, if the lease simply states that Alice must notify Bob before any assignment, Alice may assign the lease to Carol as long as she fulfills her obligation to inform Bob.

Exam Relevance

Questions on assignments often focus on the validity of assignments and the exceptions to general rules. Students may be asked to analyze hypothetical scenarios involving prohibited assignments or the necessity of consent from non-assigning parties.

Get Answers to All Your Legal Questions

Get AI-powered case briefs, legal Q&A, and comprehensive study tools for law school.