When Can Political Question in Constitutional Law?

A political question arises when the Constitution or statutes leave an issue to another branch of government, rendering it non-justiciable. Generally, courts will avoid adjudicating issues involving foreign relations, election processes, and political party operations.

The political question doctrine is a judicially created doctrine that limits the ability of federal courts to hear certain cases that are deemed more appropriate for resolution by the legislative or executive branches. This doctrine arises from cases where the Constitution provides explicit allocations of power to the branches of government, suggesting the judiciary should refrain from intervening. The factors courts typically evaluate include whether there is a lack of judicially manageable standards for resolving the issue and whether the resolution of the issue would require adjudication of parts of the Constitution that involve another branch’s duties.

One of the leading cases on the political question doctrine is Baker v. Carr (1962), where the Supreme Court identified six factors to determine whether an issue is a political question. This case emphasized that while there are areas where courts must be cautious, they also have a responsibility to review cases where constitutional violations may occur. In contrast, the case of Nixon v. United States (1993) reaffirmed the limits of judicial power, holding that the Senate's authority to try impeachments is a political question beyond the reach of judicial review.

Political questions often arise in contexts such as foreign relations or the organization of the government, where there are no clear legal standards for courts to apply. For example, the decision in Goldwater v. Carter (1979) involved the withdrawal of recognition from a foreign government without clear statutory authority, leading the Supreme Court to refrain from intervening in what it deemed a political question best left to the President and Congress.

In essence, while courts seek to uphold constitutional values, they must also adhere to the boundaries set by the separation of powers, resulting in a careful navigation of when to engage with politically charged issues. Understanding this balance is critical for law students, as it shapes the landscape of constitutional litigation and the interaction between the judiciary and other government branches.

• 1Baker v. Carr (1962) - Established factors to determine political questions.
• 2Nixon v. United States (1993) - Confirmed impeachment is a political question.
• 3Goldwater v. Carter (1979) - Addressed foreign relations and the political question doctrine.
• 4Zivotofsky v. Kerry (2015) - Involved recognition of foreign sovereigns as a political question.
• 5Rucho v. Common Cause (2019) - Held partisan gerrymandering claims are non-justiciable political questions.

• what-is-separation-of-powers
• what-is-justiciability
• how-does-judicial-review-work