Legal Rules/Civil Procedure

Diversity Jurisdiction

Quick Answer

What is the Diversity Jurisdiction?

Under 28 U.S.C. section 1332, federal courts have jurisdiction when the suit is between citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, requiring complete diversity among all plaintiffs and defendants.

Source: Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267 (1806)

Definition

Diversity jurisdiction, codified at 28 U.S.C. section 1332, grants federal district courts original jurisdiction over civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between citizens of different states, citizens of a state and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, or citizens of different states with additional foreign parties. The complete diversity rule, established in Strawbridge v. Curtiss (1806), requires that no plaintiff be a citizen of the same state as any defendant.

Citizenship for individuals is determined by domicile, which requires physical presence in a state plus the intent to remain there indefinitely. For corporations, citizenship exists in both the state of incorporation and the state where the corporation has its principal place of business. The Supreme Court in Hertz Corp. v. Friend (2010) adopted the nerve center test for principal place of business, defining it as the place where the corporation's officers direct, control, and coordinate the corporation's activities, typically its headquarters. Unincorporated associations take the citizenship of every one of their members.

The amount in controversy must exceed $75,000 and is assessed from the plaintiff's perspective at the time of filing. A plaintiff's good faith allegation of the amount controls unless it appears to a legal certainty that the claim is really for less than the jurisdictional amount. A single plaintiff may aggregate claims against a single defendant to meet the threshold, but generally may not aggregate claims against multiple defendants or with other plaintiffs, except under supplemental jurisdiction as permitted by Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.

Key Elements

  1. 1Complete diversity: no plaintiff may share citizenship with any defendant
  2. 2Amount in controversy must exceed $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs
  3. 3Individual citizenship is determined by domicile (physical presence plus intent to remain)
  4. 4Corporate citizenship includes both state of incorporation and principal place of business (nerve center test)
  5. 5Diversity is determined at the time the action is commenced
  6. 6Unincorporated associations take the citizenship of all their members

Landmark Cases

Strawbridge v. Curtiss

7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267 (1806)

Established the complete diversity rule: every plaintiff must be of different citizenship from every defendant.

Hertz Corp. v. Friend

559 U.S. 77 (2010)

Adopted the nerve center test for determining a corporation's principal place of business, defined as the place where high-level officers direct and coordinate activities.

Mas v. Perry

489 F.2d 1396 (5th Cir. 1974)

Illustrative case on domicile, holding that a married woman's domicile is determined independently and that a student does not automatically acquire domicile in the state of the university.

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.

545 U.S. 546 (2005)

Held that supplemental jurisdiction under section 1367 permits additional plaintiffs who do not independently meet the amount-in-controversy requirement in diversity cases.

Exam Tips

  • Always check the citizenship of every party. Map out each plaintiff's and each defendant's citizenship to verify complete diversity.
  • For corporations, remember dual citizenship: both the state of incorporation AND the nerve center. Either can destroy diversity.
  • Watch for manufactured diversity: a party may not be joined or may be dismissed to create or defeat diversity if that party is indispensable.
  • The amount in controversy is tested at filing; subsequent events reducing the amount below $75,000 do not divest jurisdiction.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Confusing domicile (which requires intent to remain) with mere residence or physical presence in a state.
  • Forgetting that corporations are citizens of both their state of incorporation and their principal place of business, not just one.
  • Applying minimal diversity instead of complete diversity; minimal diversity suffices only in specific statutory contexts like CAFA or interpleader.

Memory Aid

Complete diversity: every P must differ from every D. Amount: over $75K. Corporations: INC + nerve center.

Related Rules

Students Also Study

Master Every Rule with Briefly

Get unlimited access to AI case briefs, flashcards, outlines, and 6,432+ pre-written briefs. 3-day free trial, then $9.99/month.