---
title: "Likelihood of Confusion"
type: Legal Term
source: https://casebriefly.com/legal-terms/likelihood-of-confusion
---

# Likelihood of Confusion

Likelihood of confusion is the central test for trademark infringement, asking whether an appreciable number of ordinarily prudent consumers are likely to be confused about the source, sponsorship, or affiliation of goods or services bearing the accused mark. In AMF Inc. v. Sleekcraft Boats (1979), the Ninth Circuit established eight factors for this analysis: (1) strength of the mark, (2) proximity of the goods, (3) similarity of the marks, (4) evidence of actual confusion, (5) marketing channels used, (6) type of goods and degree of consumer care, (7) defendant's intent, and (8) likelihood of expansion. No single factor is dispositive, and courts weigh them holistically based on the circumstances of each case.

## Related Terms

- infringement-trademark
- trademark
- lanham-act
- distinctiveness

## Related Cases

- amf-inc-v-sleekcraft-boats

## Example

When a new energy drink company names its product 'Red Cattle' with a similar logo to Red Bull, a court would apply the Sleekcraft factors and likely find a high likelihood of confusion given the similar marks, identical product category, and overlapping marketing channels.

---
Source: [Likelihood of Confusion — CaseBriefly](https://casebriefly.com/legal-terms/likelihood-of-confusion)