Contracts · Impossibility Impracticability
medium frequencyExplore the principles and applications of impossibility and impracticability in contract law for the MBE.
Impossibility and impracticability are doctrines that relieve parties from their contractual obligations when unforeseen events render performance impossible or commercially impracticable. Impossibility refers to situations where the performance of a contract has become objectively impossible due to an event that was not contemplated by the parties at the time the contract was made, such as natural disasters or the death of a party whose personal services are required. On the other hand, impracticability allows a party to discharge their obligations when a performance becomes extremely difficult or expensive—while not impossible—due to unforeseen circumstances.
To successfully claim impossibility or impracticability, the performing party must show that the event was not due to their own fault, that it was unforeseeable, and it significantly alters the contractual terms or obligations. These defenses don't apply to mere increase in cost; the change must be drastic enough to fundamentally alter the expected performance. Clients often rely on these doctrines when facing financial difficulties or operational disruptions, necessitating a thorough understanding of their essential legal principles for effective advisement and litigation strategies.
A. A) The organizers can claim impossibility and avoid their contractual obligations.(Correct)
B. B) The organizers are required to still hold the festival indoors.
C. C) The organizers may claim impracticability but are still liable for damages.
D. D) The tornado was predictable, so they are liable for damages.
Explanation: The tornado was an unforeseen natural disaster that rendered performance of the contract impossible, allowing the organizers to claim impossibility.
A. A) Yes, the painter can claim impracticability because costs have increased significantly.
B. B) No, mere cost increase does not render the contract impracticable.(Correct)
C. C) Yes, but only if the painter can prove they did not anticipate the tariff.
D. D) No, the painter has a duty to find cheaper materials.
Explanation: The painter cannot claim impracticability based solely on increased costs; performance must be more than just significantly expensive.
A. A) They are automatically relieved of all contractual obligations.
B. B) They can claim both impossibility and impracticability.
C. C) They must show that the restrictions specifically impacted their ability to perform.(Correct)
D. D) They must provide services regardless of restrictions.
Explanation: The catering company must demonstrate that the specific government restrictions made their performance impossible or impracticable.
A. A) Impossibility, due to the landslide making the site unusable.(Correct)
B. B) Impracticability, as costs will now soar to complete the project.
C. C) Both impossibility and impracticability.
D. D) Neither, because the situation is not permanent.
Explanation: The contractor can argue impossibility as the landslide has rendered the construction site unusable.
A. A) Impossibility, as the performer is unable to sing due to health reasons.(Correct)
B. B) Impracticability, since it is a temporary illness.
C. C) Neither, as the performer should find a substitute.
D. D) Both, as performance is compromised.
Explanation: The performer can invoke impossibility if their illness renders them unable to perform, discharging their contractual obligation.