Criminal Law · Conspiracy
medium frequencyAn overview of conspiracy as tested on the MBE, including key rules, question patterns, and practice questions to prepare for the exam.
Conspiracy is an agreement between two or more parties to commit a crime, coupled with an overt act taken in furtherance of that agreement. It is essential to establish that all conspirators shared the intent to promote or facilitate the criminal objective. The MBE tests conspiracy by assessing understanding of the elements required for a conspiracy charge, the differences in the requirements for unilateral and bilateral conspiracies, and the concept of overt acts. Additionally, it evaluates the withdrawal from a conspiracy and its effects on liability.
The elements generally required to prove conspiracy include: (1) an agreement to commit an unlawful act, (2) the intent to enter into the agreement, and (3) an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. The crime of conspiracy can be charged independently even if the object crime is not completed or if all co-conspirators are acquitted of the substantive offense. The MBE often presents variations on these elements through hypothetical fact patterns involving varying intentions and actions of parties involved in a conspiracy.
A. A) A is liable for conspiracy because he agreed to commit the robbery.
B. B) A is not liable for conspiracy as he withdrew before any overt act.(Correct)
C. C) A is liable for conspiracy as B acted as his agent.
D. D) A is not liable for conspiracy since the bank was robbed.
Explanation: A is not liable for conspiracy as he effectively withdrew prior to any overt act being accomplished pertaining to the conspiracy.
A. A) C is liable for conspiracy because conspiracy does not require an overt act to begin the criminal conspiracy.
B. B) C is not liable for conspiracy because he withdrew and informed authorities before any crime was committed.(Correct)
C. C) C is liable for conspiracy since the crime of conspiracy is completed upon agreement.
D. D) C is not liable for conspiracy as he did not intend to carry out the agreement.
Explanation: C is not liable for conspiracy since he voluntarily withdrew and reported the plan to law enforcement before any overt act.
A. A) Yes, both are liable since only one overt act is required.(Correct)
B. B) No, both must commit an overt act for conspiracy to be established.
C. C) Yes, because conspiracy may proceed upon the act of any co-conspirator.
D. D) No, because Person Y must have committed the overt act.
Explanation: Yes, under the doctrine of Pinkerton, all co-conspirators are liable for the acts of others in furtherance of the conspiracy, as long as the act is in pursuit of the conspiracy’s goal.
A. A) C is liable for conspiracy because he agreed to commit a crime.
B. B) C cannot be held liable as he did not take any overt act.(Correct)
C. C) C is liable only if A and B also take overt acts.
D. D) C is not liable because he did not intend to partake in the smuggling.
Explanation: C cannot be held liable for conspiracy as there was no overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy by C.
A. A) Yes, because A and B both agreed to the robbery.
B. B) No, A successfully withdrew from the conspiracy before any overt act.(Correct)
C. C) Yes, unless A informs the police.
D. D) No, because only B committed the robbery.
Explanation: A's withdrawal prior to any overt act constitutes a defense against conspiracy, which prevents a conviction.