Real Property · Covenants Servitudes
medium frequencyAn overview of covenants and servitudes as tested on the MBE, highlighting key legal principles and common patterns.
Covenants and servitudes are essential tools in real property law designed to manage the rights of landowners concerning their property and to create cohesive communities. Covenants are promises made by property owners to do or refrain from doing something regarding their land, while servitudes provide certain rights over the property of another. Understanding the distinctions and specific requirements for creating, enforcing, and terminating these legal interests is crucial for effective land use and dispute resolution.
On the Multistate Bar Examination (MBE), questions concerning covenants and servitudes often test students on the formation, enforcement, and breach of these interests, as well as their roles in private land use management. Common issues include the requirements for imposing covenants (e.g., intent, touch and concern, privity), the distinction between affirmative and negative covenants, and the effects of changes in property law, such as the impact of the Restatement (Third) of Property.
Students should be prepared to analyze factual scenarios involving both traditional common law principles and modern statutory interpretations, stressing the importance of understanding the application of these doctrines to real-world property issues.
A. A) Yes, because it touches and concerns the land.(Correct)
B. B) No, because it is a personal promise.
C. C) Yes, because all homeowners in the area agreed.
D. D) No, because the agreement requires no writing.
Explanation: The promise touches and concerns the land because it enhances the property's aesthetic value, making it enforceable.
A. A) The intent behind the original covenant.(Correct)
B. B) The change in local zoning laws only.
C. C) The number of neighbors who are supportive of the building.
D. D) The overall aesthetics of the neighborhood.
Explanation: The intent behind the original covenant, specifically whether it can enforce its restrictions based on the original intent.
A. A) Yes, easements run with the land.(Correct)
B. B) No, they terminate upon sale.
C. C) Yes, but only if specified in the deed.
D. D) No, easements are only enforceable to original parties.
Explanation: Easements typically run with the land and remain enforceable even after the property is sold.
A. A) The restriction is enforceable as before.
B. B) The course of conduct may lead to a finding of abandonment.(Correct)
C. C) The enforcement is automatic due to its presence in the deed.
D. D) The neighbor can park because they didn’t cause the original violation.
Explanation: The landowner's failure to enforce the restriction over time likely constitutes abandonment.
A. A) Yes, if the developer intended for the covenant to run with the land.(Correct)
B. B) No, because the covenant was not part of the original deed.
C. C) Yes, because all homeowners are part of the association.
D. D) No, because the provision is only a guideline.
Explanation: The homeowners' association can enforce the provision if it was intended to run with the land and is part of the recorded declaration.