MPT Prep Guide
The Multistate Performance Test is a 90-minute, closed-universe practical lawyering exercise that appears on the bar exam in most U.S. jurisdictions. You receive two tasks drawn from a Library of legal authorities and a File of factual documents, then produce a specific legal document under time pressure. Unlike the MBE or MEE, the MPT does not test memorized law — it tests your ability to read, analyze, organize, and write like a lawyer.
MPT Format Overview
90 Minutes
Per MPT task
2 Tasks
On most bar exams
Library + File
Closed-universe format
Each MPT task provides you with a File containing factual documents (client interviews, correspondence, contracts, police reports, medical records) and a Library containing legal authorities (cases, statutes, regulations, rules). Everything you need is in the materials — you are not expected to bring outside legal knowledge. The task memo, always the first document in the File, tells you exactly what to produce and for whom.
MPT Task Types
The MPT can ask you to produce any of several different document types. Each has distinct conventions, audiences, and grading criteria. Knowing what graders expect for each task type before exam day gives you a significant advantage.
Persuasive Brief
A persuasive brief is a legal argument submitted to a court on behalf of a client. You will be asked to draft a memorandum of points and authorities, a trial brief, or an appellate brief advocating for a specific legal position. The key is taking a clear stance and marshaling the law to support your client's position.
What graders look for: Graders evaluate whether you identified the correct legal standard, applied it persuasively to the facts, addressed counterarguments, and maintained a professional advocacy tone throughout.
- Open with your strongest argument — graders form impressions quickly
- Distinguish unfavorable authority rather than ignoring it
- Use the facts from the File aggressively to support each legal point
- Follow the format specified in the task memo exactly (e.g., caption, statement of facts, argument headings)
Objective Memo
An objective memorandum is an internal document analyzing a legal question for a supervising attorney. Unlike a persuasive brief, you must present both sides of the issue fairly. The memo should identify the relevant legal rules, apply them to the client's facts, and offer a balanced assessment of likely outcomes.
What graders look for: Graders look for balanced analysis that acknowledges strengths and weaknesses on both sides, correct identification of legal standards, thorough fact application, and a clear prediction of how a court would likely rule.
- Present the stronger side first but give genuine weight to the opposing analysis
- Use IRAC or CRAC structure for each issue to keep your analysis organized
- Cite specific facts from the File when applying the law — do not speak in generalities
- Conclude with a realistic prediction, noting any uncertainties
Letter to Client
A client letter explains a legal situation, options, or advice in plain language that a non-lawyer can understand. You must translate complex legal concepts into accessible terms while remaining accurate. The tone should be professional but approachable, and you should address the client's specific concerns as outlined in the task memo.
What graders look for: Graders assess whether you explained the law accurately in layperson terms, addressed the client's specific questions, outlined options and consequences clearly, and maintained an appropriate professional tone.
- Avoid legal jargon — if you must use a legal term, define it immediately
- Structure the letter around the client's questions, not around legal issues
- Be direct about risks and uncertainties without being alarmist
- Include a clear recommendation or next steps at the end of the letter
Discovery Plan
A discovery plan outlines the information-gathering strategy for litigation. You will be asked to identify what facts are needed, what discovery methods to use (interrogatories, depositions, document requests, requests for admission), and why each piece of discovery is relevant to the legal issues in the case.
What graders look for: Graders evaluate whether you identified the key factual gaps, chose appropriate discovery tools for each type of information, explained why each discovery request is relevant, and organized the plan logically.
- Start by listing the elements you need to prove and the facts still missing
- Match the discovery method to the type of information sought — depositions for testimony, document requests for records
- Explain the strategic purpose of each request, not just what you want
- Prioritize the most critical discovery items first
Will / Contract Drafting
Drafting tasks require you to create or revise a legal document such as a will, contract provision, statute, or set of jury instructions. You must translate the client's objectives into precise legal language that accomplishes their goals while complying with applicable law. Attention to detail and technical precision are paramount.
What graders look for: Graders look for precise language that accomplishes the client's stated objectives, compliance with applicable legal requirements, internal consistency, and proper document formatting as specified in the task memo.
- Read the Library materials carefully for mandatory legal requirements and formalities
- Use the existing document format or template if one is provided in the File
- Define all key terms and ensure consistent usage throughout the document
- Address contingencies — what happens if a condition is not met or a party fails to perform
Opinion Letter
An opinion letter is a formal document in which an attorney provides a legal opinion on a specific question, typically for a client making a business or transactional decision. It requires thorough legal analysis presented in a definitive, authoritative tone. The letter must clearly state the question presented, the applicable law, the analysis, and the attorney's conclusion.
What graders look for: Graders evaluate the thoroughness of your legal analysis, the clarity of your opinion, whether you identified relevant qualifications or limitations, and whether the format follows professional conventions.
- State the scope of your opinion clearly — what you were asked and what you are not addressing
- Identify the specific documents and facts you relied upon in forming the opinion
- Note any assumptions or qualifications that limit your opinion
- Be definitive in your conclusion — the client needs a clear answer, not hedging
Step-by-Step Approach
Regardless of the specific task type, this five-step method works for every MPT. The order matters — reading the task memo first is the single most important habit you can build.
Read the Task Memo First
Always start with the task memo, not the Library. The task memo tells you exactly what document to produce, who your audience is, what format to follow, and what specific issues to address. Understanding the assignment before reading the law prevents wasted time and unfocused analysis. Note every instruction — graders check whether you followed directions precisely.
Skim the Library for Structure
Read through the Library materials (cases, statutes, regulations) to identify the relevant legal rules and how they connect to your task. Do not get bogged down in details on the first pass. Flag the key holdings, statutory provisions, and any tests or standards you will need to apply. Note which authorities help your analysis and which create obstacles.
Organize by Issue
Before you write a single word, create a brief outline organizing your response by issue. Map each legal rule to the relevant facts from the File. Decide the order of your arguments or analysis sections. A clear organizational structure is one of the most heavily weighted grading criteria — disorganized answers consistently score lower regardless of substantive quality.
Write with Purpose
Draft your response following the format specified in the task memo. Use headings and subheadings to signal your structure. For each issue, state the rule, apply it to the specific facts, and reach a conclusion. Cite to the Library materials by name. Do not waste time on eloquent prose — clear, direct writing scores higher than stylish but unclear analysis.
Proofread for Completeness
Reserve the final minutes to review your work. Check that you addressed every issue mentioned in the task memo, followed the specified format, and did not leave any analysis incomplete. Verify that your citations are accurate and that your conclusions follow logically from your analysis. A missing issue costs more points than a polished but incomplete response.
Time Management: Using Your 90 Minutes
Time management is the difference between a passing and failing MPT score. Most examinees who fail the MPT do not fail because of poor legal analysis — they fail because they run out of time and leave issues unaddressed. Here is a proven breakdown of how to allocate your 90 minutes.
Read the Task Memo
3-5 minRead the task memo carefully, noting the document type, audience, format requirements, and specific issues to address. Re-read it once to catch details you missed.
Read the File
10-12 minReview the factual materials in the File. Highlight or note key facts that relate to the legal issues. Identify your client's goals, the opposing party's position, and any critical dates or events.
Read the Library
15-18 minStudy the cases, statutes, and other legal authorities. Extract the rules, tests, and standards you need. Note how each authority applies to your facts. Flag the most important holdings.
Outline and Organize
8-10 minCreate a structured outline mapping rules to facts for each issue. Decide the order of your sections. This investment pays off enormously in writing speed and grading scores.
Write Your Response
40-45 minDraft the document following your outline. Write in complete paragraphs with clear topic sentences. Cite Library materials by name. Do not aim for perfection — aim for completeness and clarity.
Review and Proofread
3-5 minCheck for completeness: did you address every issue? Follow the format? Reach conclusions? Fix any obvious errors but do not rewrite sections — time is better spent ensuring nothing is missing.
Common MPT Mistakes
These are the errors that cost examinees the most points. Awareness alone can prevent most of them.
Reading the Library before the task memo — you waste time on irrelevant material because you do not know what the assignment requires
Ignoring the specified format — if the task memo says to use point headings or a specific structure, deviating costs significant points
Writing a law school exam answer instead of the requested document — the MPT tests practical lawyering, not abstract legal analysis
Failing to use facts from the File — legal analysis without specific fact application reads as incomplete and generic
Spending too long reading and not enough time writing — even a perfect understanding is worthless if you run out of time before finishing
Treating all Library materials as equally important — some are included as adverse authority or background; focus on the most relevant sources
Not organizing before writing — jumping straight into drafting produces disjointed, stream-of-consciousness responses that score poorly
Copying large blocks of text from the Library — graders want to see your analysis and application, not your ability to transcribe
Missing the audience — a client letter should not read like a brief to a court, and vice versa
Leaving an issue completely unaddressed — it is better to write a brief analysis of every issue than a thorough analysis of only some issues
Practice Tips
The MPT is the most improvable component of the bar exam. With deliberate practice, you can turn it from a weakness into a reliable source of points.
Complete at least 10-15 full MPT practice tasks under timed conditions before your bar exam — familiarity with the format is half the battle
Start with released MPTs from your jurisdiction's bar examiners — these are the most realistic practice materials available
After each practice MPT, compare your response to the sample answers point by point and note what you missed
Practice reading and outlining the materials in 30-35 minutes — if your reading phase consistently runs long, you need to practice skimming more efficiently
Time yourself separately on reading, outlining, and writing to identify which phase is causing problems
Study the sample answers for organizational patterns — most high-scoring answers share similar structural approaches
Practice writing under time pressure even if your analysis is not perfect — the MPT rewards completion over perfection
Create a personal checklist for each task type so you can quickly verify completeness before submitting
Read the NCBE's published MPT point sheets to understand exactly how graders allocate points across issues
If you consistently run out of time, practice the outline-first method until it becomes automatic — structured writers finish faster