Contracts Outline

Infancy Study Outline

This outline covers the doctrine of infancy in contract law, focusing on the capacity of minors, principles of disaffirmance, and key rules and cases.

Definition and Legal Capacity of Minors

Infancy refers to the legal status of individuals who are under the age of majority, which is typically 18 years in most jurisdictions. Minors are considered to lack the capacity to enter into binding contracts, primarily to protect them from their inexperience and immaturity. According to common law principles, contracts entered into by minors are voidable at the minor's discretion. This means that minors can affirm or disaffirm contracts upon reaching the age of majority or within a reasonable time thereafter. The rule promotes fairness and protects minors from exploitation in contractual relationships.

The age at which an individual is considered a minor can vary by jurisdiction; however, the age of majority is generally set at 18 years. Exceptions to this principle can arise in cases involving necessities such as food, clothing, and shelter, wherein a minor may be held liable for reasonable value. Courts typically employ a subjective standard when evaluating a minor's ability to understand the nature and consequences of their contractual agreements, focusing on the specific circumstances of each case.

Key Rules

  • Contracts with minors are voidable at the minor's discretion.
  • Minors can affirm contracts upon reaching the age of majority or within a reasonable time thereafter.
Disaffirmance and Affirmation

Disaffirmance is the legal right of a minor to void a contract at any time before reaching the age of majority or shortly thereafter. This can be done explicitly through a clear declaration or implicitly by failing to perform under the contract. The disaffirmance must be communicated to the other party, and it is important that any return of consideration is made where possible. Some jurisdictions require minors to return the value of benefits received, although others follow a more lenient approach, allowing minors to simply disaffirm without restitution if it does not impose excessive burden on them.

Once a minor attains the age of majority, they may choose to affirm the contract, thereby ratifying it and rendering it enforceable against them. This affirmation can be explicit through a written or oral agreement, or implicit through actions indicating commitment to the contract's terms. It is crucial for legal practitioners to note that once affirmation is made, the minor relinquishes the right to disaffirm, making the contract binding and enforceable.

Key Rules

  • Disaffirmance allows minors to void contracts before or shortly after reaching majority.
  • Affirmation of a contract after reaching majority renders it enforceable.
Key Cases
Corpe v OvertonEstablished early principles governing the capacity of minors in contract law and the enforceability of contracts they enter.
Dodson v. ShraderClarified the concept of reasonable value and the obligations of minors upon disaffirmance of contracts involving necessities.
Exam Checklist
  • Identify whether the parties include a minor.
  • Determine if the contract is voidable or enforceable.
  • Assess the possibility and procedure for disaffirmance.
  • Evaluate circumstances involving necessities and their impact on enforceability.
  • Analyze potential affirmation of the contract upon reaching majority.

Study Smarter with Briefly

Get AI-powered outlines, flashcards, and practice questions for every law school subject.