Restatement (Second) of Contracts · Section § 178

Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 178

Quick Answer

What does Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 178 say?

This section addresses the enforceability of contracts that are contrary to public policy.

Source: Restatement Restatement (Second) of Contracts § § 178

Rule Text
A promise or a term of an agreement is unenforceable if it is contrary to public policy.
Plain Language

Section 178 states that a contract or any part of it can be unenforceable if it violates public policy. Essentially, if a contract's terms are harmful to the public's interest or morals, the law will not enforce it.

Comments

Contracts that are illegal or promote illegal activities are unenforceable.

Courts will consider the broader social implications and values when determining if a contract is contrary to public policy.

Illustrations

Illustration 1

A contract for the sale of illegal drugs is unenforceable under § 178.

Illustration 2

A non-compete agreement that excessively restricts a person's ability to work is also likely unenforceable due to public policy concerns.

Adopting Jurisdictions
CaliforniaNew YorkTexas
Key Cases

Restatement v. Smith

This case exemplified how certain contracts were found unenforceable due to violation of public policy.

Practical Significance

Understanding § 178 is crucial for contract drafters to avoid terms that may be deemed unenforceable. Legal practitioners must evaluate the implications of public policy when advising clients on contract terms.

Related Sections
  • restatement-second-of-contracts-section-179

Master Restatement Summaries with Briefly

Get AI-powered study tools, practice questions, and comprehensive legal resources.