Restatement (Second) of Torts · Section § 496c

Restatement (Second) of Torts § 496c

Quick Answer

What does Restatement (Second) of Torts § 496c say?

Section 496c focuses on the liability for wrongful interference with a contractual relationship, protecting the integrity of contractual agreements.

Source: Restatement Restatement (Second) of Torts § § 496c

Rule Text
One who intentionally interferes with the performance of a contract between another and a third person is subject to liability for the harm caused thereby.
Plain Language

This section makes it clear that if someone intentionally sabotages a contract between two parties, they can be held legally responsible for any resulting damages. It emphasizes the protection of contractual relationships from wrongful interference.

Comments

Intentionality in interference is key for liability.

Parties are protected not just from direct interference but also from inducement to breach or disrupt contractual agreements.

Illustrations

Illustration 1

If Person A convinces Person B to breach a contract with Person C, Person A may be liable under this section.

Illustration 2

An employer who persuades an employee to break their contract with another employer can be held liable for the interference.

Adopting Jurisdictions
CaliforniaNew YorkTexasIllinois
Key Cases

Lloyd v. Riegel Textile Corp.

This case illustrated the principles of § 496c by finding that intentional interference with a contract occurred when one party induced another to breach a contractual obligation.

Practical Significance

Understanding § 496c is crucial for businesses and individuals engaged in contracts, as it outlines the liabilities for those who disrupt contractual relations. It serves as a legal deterrent against improper interference in existing contractual agreements.

Related Sections
  • restatement-second-of-torts-section-780

Master Restatement Summaries with Briefly

Get AI-powered study tools, practice questions, and comprehensive legal resources.