All Federal · Administrative Agency
Explore the De Novo standard of review as applied to administrative agencies in federal courts, including its definition, application, and key factors.
Source: De Novo
The De Novo standard of review allows courts to review a matter anew, without deferring to the administrative agency's previous conclusions. This standard means that the court considers the evidence and legal questions from scratch, as if no decision had been made by the agency.
This standard is typically applied in cases where the legal issues are purely statutory or constitutional in nature, and where the agency’s interpretation is not afforded deference. It is often invoked in instances involving the interpretation of statutes or regulations rather than the agency's factual determinations.
The Supreme Court established that courts must defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of ambiguous statutes it administers, unless the review is conducted de novo.
The Court articulated that an agency's interpretation does not receive Chevron deference but is entitled to respect guided by a variety of factors such as persuasive value and consistency.
De Novo review differs from the 'arbitrary and capricious' standard, which provides a limited review focusing on the agency's decision-making process. Conversely, 'substantial evidence' review is limited to examining whether a reasonable mind could agree with the agency's factual findings, while de novo allows broader scrutiny.