Wisconsin
How Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co. applies in Wisconsin: state-specific rules, key cases, and bar exam notes for Other.
Wisconsin law mirrors the principles established in Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co. regarding civil rights and equal protection. The state ensures that public accommodations maintain non-discriminatory practices, especially in cases involving racial discrimination.
In Wisconsin, under Wis. Stat. § 106.52, any person who engages in discriminatory practices in public accommodations is subject to civil liability.
The court upheld that discrimination based on race in public accommodations constitutes a violation of civil rights protections.
The court affirmed liability for public accommodations that fail to prevent racially motivated harassment.
This case further established that individuals facing discrimination can pursue damages under the state’s fair employment laws.
While both federal and Wisconsin law prohibit racial discrimination in public accommodations as established in Adickes, Wisconsin's laws provide broader definitions and protections under the Fair Employment Act. The state may impose stricter penalties and has more comprehensive enforcement mechanisms compared to federal standards.
Knowledge of Adickes and its principles is often tested in the context of civil rights law on the Wisconsin bar exam, especially relating to public accommodations.