Wisconsin
How A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States applies in Wisconsin: state-specific rules, key cases, and bar exam notes for Administrative Law.
Wisconsin law maintains a similar perspective to the A.L.A. Schechter Poultry principles by emphasizing the distinction between legislative authority and executive rule-making. The state firmly follows principles of delegation and non-delegation, ensuring that administrative agencies do not exceed their statutory authority.
In Wisconsin, administrative agencies must operate within the bounds of the authority granted by the legislature, ensuring that any regulations promulgated are directly traceable to legislative intent.
The court held that administrative decisions must be grounded in statutory authority to be valid.
The ruling emphasized that local administrative agencies must not create laws but instead enforce existing statutes.
This case reinforced the principle that administrative rules must clearly delineate the authority provided by the legislature.
Wisconsin's approach aligns with the federal non-delegation doctrine as articulated in A.L.A. Schechter but may differ in the extent and interpretation of what constitutes excessive delegation. While both systems seek to limit administrative power, Wisconsin law places additional emphasis on direct legislative authorization.
Knowledge of non-delegation principles as set forth in A.L.A. Schechter Poultry and their Wisconsin applications may appear in Wisconsin bar exam questions relating to administrative powers and agency control.