Connecticut
How Angel v. Murray applies in Connecticut: state-specific rules, key cases, and bar exam notes for Contracts.
Connecticut law recognizes the principle established in Angel v. Murray regarding modification of contracts supported by consideration. The courts will enforce modifications if they are made in good faith and are related to changes in circumstances that were not anticipated at the time of the original agreement.
In Connecticut, contract modifications require consideration, but the notion of good faith can sometimes suffice in specific instances where unforeseen circumstances arise.
Held that a modification was enforceable as it was made in good faith and appropriate consideration was present despite changing circumstances.
Determined that parties may alter contractual obligations if changes are prompted by unforeseen exigencies.
Affirmed that modifications without additional consideration could be upheld if the modifications were necessary and equitable.
Connecticut's approach aligns closely with the Restatement (Second) of Contracts, which allows for modification without consideration in certain circumstances, differing from the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) which requires good faith in commercial dealings. The emphasis on good faith in both jurisdictions highlights a shared commitment to equitable parties in contractual relationships.
Questions regarding contract modifications may appear on the Connecticut bar exam, especially as they pertain to the principles derived from Angel v. Murray regarding modifications and consideration.