Florida
How Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court applies in Florida: state-specific rules, key cases, and bar exam notes for Other.
In Florida, the principles of personal jurisdiction established in Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court are taken into account with respect to both specific and general jurisdiction. Florida courts emphasize the necessity of minimum contacts and the fair play and substantial justice standard when determining jurisdiction over foreign entities.
Florida requires that a defendant have sufficient minimum contacts with the state, making it reasonable and just to exercise jurisdiction over them.
The court held that a foreign manufacturer with no direct contacts to Florida could not be subjected to jurisdiction in the state despite a product being sold in the state.
The court found that a single act within Florida was sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction for a foreign corporation engaged in commercial activity.
The court ruled that a non-resident defendant’s deliberate contacts with Florida through the internet could establish jurisdiction.
Florida's approach closely aligns with the federal standard set forth in International Shoe Co. v. Washington, emphasizing the requirement for sufficient minimum contacts. However, Florida courts may also apply a more flexible standard in cases involving state-specific statutes that bolster jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants.
Understanding personal jurisdiction is a critical component of Florida Bar exam preparation, particularly in relation to multi-state practice and civil procedure.