Washington
How Blakely v. Washington applies in Washington: state-specific rules, key cases, and bar exam notes for Criminal Procedure.
In Washington, the principles established in Blakely v. Washington emphasize that any fact that increases a sentence beyond the standard range must be proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. This reinforces the right to a jury trial in determining facts that influence sentencing.
Under Washington law, any aggravating factor that leads to an exceptional sentence must be found by a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt, consistent with the Sixth Amendment ruling in Blakely.
The court ruled that the sentencing enhancements based on facts not found by a jury violate the rights established in Blakely.
The ruling reinforced that any fact increasing the maximum sentence must be presented to a jury, following the precedent set by Blakely.
Determined that failure to have a jury decide on enhancements results in an unconstitutional sentence under Blakely.
Washington’s interpretation of Blakely closely aligns with federal standards, emphasizing jury findings in sentencing enhancements. However, Washington has also developed specific statutory frameworks for addressing how enhancements are applied, which may differ from federal practices.
Understanding Blakely is crucial for Washington bar exam takers, particularly in Criminal Procedure, as it addresses foundational rights regarding sentencing and jury determinations.