Nevada
How Calder v. Bull applies in Nevada: state-specific rules, key cases, and bar exam notes for Constitutional Law.
Nevada adheres to the principle established in Calder v. Bull that prohibits ex post facto laws. This aligns with the broader constitutional protections afforded under both state and federal law.
Nevada Constitution, Article 1, Section 15 explicitly forbids ex post facto laws, reinforcing the legal principles determined in Calder v. Bull.
The court held that a retrospective application of a statute that increases punishment for a crime violates the ex post facto clause.
The court determined that changing the rules of evidence applicable to pending cases constituted an ex post facto law.
Reinstatement of penalties that were previously abolished could not be applied retroactively under Nevada's commitment to prohibiting ex post facto laws.
Nevada's approach to ex post facto laws closely mirrors the federal standard applied in Calder v. Bull, recognizing that laws which retroactively change the legal consequences of prior actions infringe upon individual rights.
Understanding the prohibition of ex post facto laws is crucial for the Nevada bar exam, particularly in Constitutional Law questions regarding legislative retroactivity.