New Hampshire
How Calvert Cliffs' Coordinating Committee, Inc. v. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission applies in New Hampshire: state-specific rules, key cases, and bar exam notes for Other.
New Hampshire recognizes the importance of public involvement in environmental decision-making, aligning with the principles established in Calvert Cliffs. State regulators are required to consider environmental impacts and public input during the review process.
New Hampshire law mandates that agencies prepare Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) similar to the requirements outlined in NEPA, ensuring that environmental consequences are considered in state-level decision-making.
The court emphasized the requirement for evaluating environmental impacts under New Hampshire's Site Evaluation Committee rules.
Reinforced that public commentary must be considered in any environmental permitting process.
Established that agencies must provide adequate reasoning for dismissing public concerns related to environmental harm.
New Hampshire's approach closely mirrors the federal NEPA framework by emphasizing public participation and environmental assessments. However, state law may provide more stringent requirements for public notification and involvement during the permitting process compared to federal standards.
Understanding the principles of public involvement and environmental assessment is crucial for the New Hampshire bar exam, particularly in administrative law sections that deal with agency decision-making.