Washington
How Carlill V Carbolic Smoke Ball applies in Washington: state-specific rules, key cases, and bar exam notes for Other.
In Washington, the principles established in Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball are recognized in the context of unilateral contracts. The state emphasizes the importance of intent and reasonable reliance in enforcing advertisements as offers rather than mere invitations to treat.
Washington follows the principle that a valid unilateral contract is formed when one party makes a promise in exchange for an act, and the other party performs that act, demonstrating acceptance.
The court upheld that an advertisement promising a reward for the return of lost property constituted a unilateral offer that was accepted upon performance of the act.
The court ruled that an advertisement promising a cash reward for information leading to an arrest was enforceable as a unilateral contract.
The court found that a promotional offer stating 'first 100 customers get free pizza' was a unilateral offer that led to contractual obligations upon acceptance through action.
Washington law aligns with federal principles regarding unilateral contracts, particularly those established in Carlill. However, Washington requires clear expression of intent and allows for more lascivious interpretations of advertisements than some federal standards, which can be stricter in determining liability.
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball principles are pertinent for the Washington bar exam, particularly in contract law questions focusing on unilateral contracts and advertisements.