Nevada
How Cloverdale Equipment Co. v. Tarrant applies in Nevada: state-specific rules, key cases, and bar exam notes for Remedies.
Nevada's approach to contract remedies emphasizes the need for parties to be compensated for their losses arising from a breach. The focus is on making the non-breaching party whole in accordance with the principles established in Cloverdale Equipment Co. v. Tarrant, which relates closely to the right to recover consequential damages.
In Nevada, a party who suffers damages due to breach of contract can recover all damages that are a natural result of the breach, including consequential damages, as long as they were foreseeable to both parties at the time the contract was formed.
This case reaffirmed the principle that consequential damages are recoverable in Nevada, as long as they meet the foreseeability requirement.