Wisconsin

Donnelly v. HarperCollins Publishers in Wisconsin Law

How Donnelly v. HarperCollins Publishers applies in Wisconsin: state-specific rules, key cases, and bar exam notes for Entertainment & Sports Law.

State Approach

Wisconsin law recognizes the right to publicity, protecting individuals from unauthorized commercial use of their identities. In applying principles from Donnelly, Wisconsin courts emphasize the balance between First Amendment rights and an individual's right to control the commercial use of their persona.

State Rule
Under Wisconsin Statute § 995.50, individuals have the right to control the commercial use of their name, likeness, and representation without consent, which aligns with the principles established in Donnelly.
Significant State Cases

Hoffman v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.

The court held that use of a celebrity's likeness for commercial purposes without consent constitutes an actionable violation of their publicity rights.

Motschall v. E. Wisconsin Crippled Children’s, Inc.

The court ruled against the unauthorized use of a deceased individual's likeness for promotional purposes, reinforcing state protection over personal identity rights.

Tatum v. Sports & Entertainment, LLC

The decision reaffirmed that use of an athlete's image in a digital advertisement required explicit consent, upholding the doctrine of publicity rights in commercial contexts.

Comparison to Federal Law

While federal law, particularly the First Amendment, provides certain protections for expressive uses, Wisconsin’s approach is more robust in protecting individual publicity rights. The state’s emphasis on the importance of consent for commercial exploitation distinguishes its application from broader federal standards.

Bar Exam Note

Understanding the implications of publicity rights in light of Donnelly is crucial for the Wisconsin bar exam, especially for areas involving contracts and tort law.

Practice Pointers
  • Always obtain consent before using an individual's likeness or identity for commercial purposes.
  • Be aware of the distinctions between artistic expression, which may invoke First Amendment protections, and commercial exploitation which requires consent.
  • Consider the applicability of state statutes in addition to federal law when advising clients on publicity rights issues.

Master State-Specific Law with Briefly

Get AI-powered state case analyses, bar exam prep, and comprehensive study tools.