Washington
How Drennan V Star Paving applies in Washington: state-specific rules, key cases, and bar exam notes for Other.
In Washington, the principles from Drennan v. Star Paving are applied with a focus on the reliance interest of the party who receives an offer. Washington courts recognize the enforceability of a unilateral contract when the offer induces significant reliance, even if the offeror later attempts to withdraw their offer.
A contractor's bid, once accepted and substantial reliance has occurred by the offeree, can create enforceable contract obligations under Washington law, taking into account the principle of reliance.
The court held that public entities must honor bids once they have been accepted and substantial reliance has occurred, drawing directly from Drennan principles.
The court reaffirmed that promises leading to reliance may create enforceable duties, aligning with Drennan's reliance on binding promises.
The court ruled that reliance damages are recoverable, emphasizing the importance of equitable principles similar to those in Drennan.
Washington's approach generally aligns with the federal standard set forth in Drennan v. Star Paving, particularly concerning reliance interests. However, Washington courts may provide a broader interpretation of enforceable reliance in certain contexts, offering additional protections to those who rely on offers.
Understanding the reliance principle from Drennan is crucial for the Washington bar exam, as questions may test students on contract formation and enforceability related to bid reliance.