Michigan
How Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc. applies in Michigan: state-specific rules, key cases, and bar exam notes for Torts and Civil Procedure (Products Liability; Class Actions).
Michigan follows the precedent set by Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc. by permitting class actions in product liability cases, notably when common issues among claimants exist. The state allows for aggregation of claims, particularly when dealing with similar legal and factual questions.
In Michigan, products liability claims can proceed as class actions if they meet the prerequisites of commonality, typicality, and predominance under MCR 3.501.
The court ruled that class certification is appropriate when the key issues regarding the defendant's liability are the same across all class members.
This case affirmed that consumer fraud claims can be pursued as class actions, citing the similarities and common economic injuries experienced by the members.
The court emphasized the need for predominance of common questions of law or fact in establishing class certification in product liability cases.
Michigan's approach aligns closely with the federal rules regarding class actions, particularly Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. However, Michigan courts may allow slightly more latitude in certifying classes based on state-specific consumer protection laws compared to federal standards.
Engle's principles on class actions in product liability are relevant for broader concepts of torts and civil procedure, making it likely to appear on the Michigan bar exam.