Arizona
How Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co. applies in Arizona: state-specific rules, key cases, and bar exam notes for Intellectual Property.
Arizona follows the principles established in Feist, recognizing that originality requires a minimal degree of creativity and that mere facts do not receive copyright protection. This aligns with federal standards, reinforcing the idea that compilation without originality falls outside copyright law.
In Arizona, as in federal law, a work must exhibit some originality beyond mere factual compilation to be eligible for copyright protection.
Held that compilations of facts require creativity to be protected under copyright, consistent with the ruling in Feist.
Affirmed that raw data, such as phone directories, lacks copyright protection unless presented with creativity.
Clarified that a mere arrangement of facts does not qualify as a copyrightable work without original expression.
Arizona's approach to copyright protection aligns closely with federal standards set by Feist, both emphasizing the necessity of originality in works. Arizona courts will apply the same foundational principles in determining copyright eligibility, reinforcing the federal copyright framework.
Feist's principles are essential for understanding copyright eligibility and are likely to be tested on the Arizona bar exam, particularly in questions involving factual compilations.