Ohio
How Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co. applies in Ohio: state-specific rules, key cases, and bar exam notes for Copyright.
Ohio adheres to the principles established in Feist, emphasizing the necessity of originality in copyright claims. It recognizes that mere compilation of facts, without a creative spark, does not merit copyright protection.
In Ohio, for a compilation to be copyrightable, it must contain an original selection or arrangement of facts that demonstrates creativity.
The court ruled that the selection of data for a textbook did not embody original expression necessary for copyright protection.
The court held that a database lacking uniqueness in its organization fails the originality requirement set forth in Feist.
This case reinforced the idea that databases must show creativity in selection or arrangement to be eligible for copyright protection under Ohio law.
Ohio's application of the Feist principles aligns closely with federal law, both emphasizing the requirement of originality in compilations. However, Ohio courts may apply a more detailed analysis regarding the selection and arrangement of content compared to the more generalized federal approach.
Questions regarding copyright, especially on originality and compilation, may reflect Ohio’s application of Feist principles and related state-case rulings.