New Hampshire
How Fiege v. Boehm applies in New Hampshire: state-specific rules, key cases, and bar exam notes for Other.
New Hampshire follows a similar principle to Fiege v. Boehm regarding the viability of claims based on emotional distress and psychological harm. However, the specificity of the allegations and supporting evidence are critical in establishing a prima facie case of emotional distress.
Under New Hampshire law, an individual can claim emotional distress if they can provide sufficient evidence that the conduct in question was outrageous and caused severe emotional distress.
The court held that plaintiffs must demonstrate extreme and outrageous conduct to succeed in an emotional distress claim.
The court found that the plaintiff's allegations were too vague to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress.
The court ruled that the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress was not satisfied by general allegations without specific instances of outrageous conduct.
Similar to federal standards, New Hampshire requires plaintiffs to show that the conduct was extreme and outrageous. However, New Hampshire places a stronger emphasis on specific factual details in claims of emotional distress, which can lead to different outcomes.
New Hampshire bar exam may include questions about emotional distress torts and the requisite standards for proving such claims based on New Hampshire jurisprudence.