Ohio
How First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles applies in Ohio: state-specific rules, key cases, and bar exam notes for Constitutional Law (Takings).
Ohio courts follow the principles set forth in First English Evangelical Lutheran Church, recognizing the doctrine of regulatory takings. Ohio law requires compensation for private property when government regulation results in a substantial interference with the owner's use and enjoyment of the property.
In Ohio, a property owner may claim a taking if a government regulation deprives them of all economically viable use of their property, following the precedent established by First English.
The Ohio Supreme Court held that a government regulation that deprives a landowner of economically beneficial use of their property may constitute a taking under Ohio law.
The court ruled that an ordinance that imposed significant restrictions on property use without offering compensation amounted to a taking.
In this case, the court found that regulatory restrictions that severely limited property development constituted a compensable taking.
Ohio's approach closely mirrors the federal standard articulated in First English Evangelical Lutheran Church, which also emphasizes significant economic deprivation as a criterion for determining regulatory takings. However, Ohio case law sometimes emphasizes state statutes more explicitly when assessing just compensation.
Understanding the application of takings principles in Ohio, particularly in relation to regulatory actions by state and local governments, is essential for the Ohio bar exam, frequently tested under property law and constitutional law sections.