Administrative Law

Kisor v. Wilkie — Study Notes

Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S. Ct. 2400 (U.S. Supreme Court 2019)

Study notes for Kisor v. Wilkie: professor notes, cold call prep, exam angles, and memory aids.

The Court upheld Auer deference but circumscribed its application to ensure adequate judicial scrutiny of agency interpretations.
Professor Notes

In Kisor v. Wilkie, the Supreme Court addresses pivotal questions surrounding Auer deference, focusing on how much weight courts should give an agency's interpretation of its own regulations. The Court reinforced the doctrine but clarified its application, emphasizing that deference should only be granted when certain stringent criteria are met. This case illustrates the delicate balance between administrative agency expertise and judicial oversight, particularly in the context of veterans' benefits and the interpretation of regulatory terms.

Cold Call Prep
  1. 1What are the criteria established by the Court for applying Auer deference?
  2. 2How did the Supreme Court's decision change the landscape of administrative law regarding agency interpretations?
  3. 3Explain the significance of 'relevant' in the context of this case.
  4. 4What previous case did the Court reaffirm regarding Auer deference?
  5. 5Discuss the implications of this case for veterans seeking benefits.
  6. 6What is the difference between Auer deference and Chevron deference?
  7. 7What were the major concerns raised in dissent regarding the majority's decision?
Mnemonic Device

Auer Applies after A, B, C: Agency's expertise, Binding interpretation, Court finds ambiguity.

Distinguish From
CaseDistinction
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Chevron deference applies to agency interpretation of statutes rather than their own regulations, as seen in Kisor.
Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Skidmore recognizes that agency interpretations may receive deference based on their persuasiveness and thoroughness, unlike the more rigid Auer standard.
United States v. Mead Corp.Mead established that Chevron deference applies only when Congress delegates authority to an agency for rulemaking, which has a different threshold compared to Auer.
Policy Arguments

For the Rule

Maintaining Auer deference supports agencies' ability to leverage their expertise in interpreting complex regulations, which can benefit affected individuals.

Against the Rule

Restricting Auer deference can promote judicial independence and ensure that agencies do not overreach in their regulatory interpretations.

Class Discussion Points
  • What implications does this ruling have on the future of administrative regulation?
  • How does Kisor v. Wilkie reflect the Court's approach to the relationship between judicial and agency interpretations?
  • In what contexts might Auer deference continue to be problematic or beneficial?
Exam Angle

This case often appears on exams in discussions regarding administrative law principles, particularly the limits and applications of Auer deference and its impact on judicial review of agency decisions.

Ace Your Cold Calls with Briefly

Get AI-powered case briefs, study notes, and cold call prep for every case in your casebook.