Health Law

Simon v. Eastern Kentucky University — Study Notes

656 F.3d 1233 (6th Cir. 2010)

Study notes for Simon v. Eastern Kentucky University: professor notes, cold call prep, exam angles, and memory aids.

Educational institutions are not required to provide accommodations that fundamentally alter the nature of their programs under the ADA and Section 504.
Professor Notes

In Simon v. Eastern Kentucky University, the court examined the balance between accommodating students with disabilities and preserving the integrity of educational programs. The plaintiff, a student with a documented disability, contended that the university failed to provide necessary accommodations that would enable her to succeed in a health-related program. Professor discussions often emphasize the implications of reasonable accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, outlining the court's reasoning that certain accommodations may fundamentally alter the nature of academic programs.

The analysis of what constitutes a 'reasonable accommodation' is crucial, as the court ruled that Simon's requested adjustments were unreasonable. Understanding how this case impacts future ADA claims and the thresholds that courts might apply when determining accommodations is vital for pre-law and law students alike. The case highlights the need for students to work collaboratively with institutions to develop accommodations that are both beneficial and feasible, including the limitations that educational institutions face in terms of maintaining program standards.

Cold Call Prep
  1. 1Discuss the legal standards for reasonable accommodations under the ADA and Section 504.
  2. 2What factors did the court consider in determining the reasonableness of Simon's requested accommodations?
  3. 3Explain the significance of the holding in Simon v. Eastern Kentucky University in the context of health law.
  4. 4How does Simon v. Eastern Kentucky University illustrate the balance between student rights and institutional integrity?
  5. 5What implications does this case have for future disability accommodation requests in educational settings?
Mnemonic Device

RAPID - Reasonable Accommodations Preserve Institutional Distinctiveness.

Distinguish From
CaseDistinction
Southeastern Community College v. DavisIn Davis, the court held that a community college failed to provide reasonable accommodations, which did not fundamentally alter the program, unlike in Simon.
Schneider v. Johnston Community CollegeIn Schneider, the requested accommodations were found to be reasonable and essential to the student's success, contrasting with Simon's excessive requests.
Policy Arguments

For the Rule

Allowing educational institutions to determine the limits of reasonable accommodations maintains the quality and integrity of specialized educational programs, ensuring that all students receive a fair opportunity without compromising educational standards.

Against the Rule

Restricting the scope of reasonable accommodations may disadvantage students with disabilities by limiting their ability to pursue health-related professions despite having valid needs for support.

Class Discussion Points
  • Discuss the burden of proof on students requesting accommodations.
  • Evaluate the role of communication between students and educational institutions in resolving accommodation disputes.
  • Consider the societal implications of maintaining academic integrity versus ensuring equal access for all students.
Exam Angle

This case may appear on exams in the context of evaluating reasonable accommodations, along with the legal standards under the ADA and Section 504. Students should be prepared to analyze how courts might balance student needs against institutional obligations.

Ace Your Cold Calls with Briefly

Get AI-powered case briefs, study notes, and cold call prep for every case in your casebook.