Free Template
IRAC Analysis Template
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) is the foundational legal analysis framework taught in every law school. This template provides a structured approach to analyzing any legal question using the IRAC method.
When to Use This Template
Use this template for exam answers, legal memos, case analyses, and any legal writing that requires structured reasoning. IRAC is especially critical for law school exams where professors grade on analytical structure.
Template
IRAC ANALYSIS ISSUE: [Identify the specific legal issue or question to be resolved. Frame it as a narrow, answerable question. A well-framed issue incorporates the legal standard and the relevant facts. Guidance: Start with "Whether" or "The issue is whether..." Be specific — avoid broad, abstract questions. Each distinct legal question should have its own IRAC analysis.] RULE: [State the applicable legal rule, standard, or test. Include: - The source of the rule (statute, case law, constitutional provision) - All elements or factors of the test - Any relevant exceptions or qualifications - Key definitions of legal terms Guidance: Be precise and complete. If the rule has a multi-factor test, list every factor. If there is a majority/minority rule split, note both. Always cite your sources.] APPLICATION: [Apply each element of the rule to the specific facts of your problem. This is the most important section — it demonstrates your analytical ability. Guidance: - Address each element or factor separately - Use facts from the problem to show why each element is or is not satisfied - Argue both sides when the analysis is close - Use analogical reasoning: compare your facts to precedent cases - Do not introduce new rules here — only apply the rules stated above - This section should be the longest part of your analysis] CONCLUSION: [State your conclusion clearly. Answer the issue you identified. Guidance: Be definitive — state whether the element/claim/defense is likely satisfied or not. A brief explanation of the strongest reason supports your credibility. If the outcome is genuinely uncertain, acknowledge the close question but still commit to a position.]