Class Actions
Class actions under Rule 23 allow representative parties to sue on behalf of a class, requiring numerosity, commonality, typicality, and adequate representation, plus fitting into one of three categories.
Overview
Class actions allow one or more representative parties to litigate on behalf of a larger group that shares common claims. Federal class actions are governed by Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Rule 23(a) establishes four prerequisites that every class action must satisfy: (1) numerosity — the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (2) commonality — there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (3) typicality — the claims of the representative parties are typical of the class; and (4) adequacy — the representatives will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.
Wal-Mart v. Dukes heightened the commonality requirement, holding that plaintiffs must demonstrate that the class members' claims depend on a common contention capable of classwide resolution — meaning that determination of its truth or falsity will resolve an issue central to the validity of each claim in one stroke.
Beyond the prerequisites, the class must fit one of three categories under Rule 23(b). Rule 23(b)(1) applies when individual adjudications would create incompatible obligations for the defendant or impair other class members' interests. Rule 23(b)(2) applies when the defendant has acted on grounds generally applicable to the class, making injunctive or declaratory relief appropriate. Rule 23(b)(3) — the most common — applies when common questions predominate over individual questions and a class action is superior to other methods of adjudication.
Amchem Products v. Windsor held that settlement-only class actions must independently satisfy Rule 23's requirements, particularly predominance and adequacy of representation.
Key Takeaway
Every class action must satisfy four Rule 23(a) prerequisites (numerosity, commonality, typicality, adequacy) and fit one of the three Rule 23(b) categories.
Exam Tip
Walk through each 23(a) prerequisite separately, then identify the correct 23(b) category. For 23(b)(3), always analyze predominance and superiority. Remember Wal-Mart v. Dukes raised the bar on commonality.
Landmark Cases (6)
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the four prerequisites for a class action under Rule 23(a)?
Numerosity (class too large for joinder), commonality (common questions of law or fact), typicality (representative claims typical of the class), and adequacy (representative will fairly protect class interests).
What is the predominance requirement under Rule 23(b)(3)?
Predominance requires that questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over questions affecting only individual members. It is more demanding than commonality and requires that common issues be central to the litigation.
What did Wal-Mart v. Dukes do to class action requirements?
Wal-Mart v. Dukes heightened the commonality standard by requiring that class claims depend on a common contention whose resolution will resolve a central issue for every class member. Broad allegations of a 'common policy' without proof of a specific discriminatory practice are insufficient.
Master Class Actions with Briefly
AI-powered tools built for law students. Generate case briefs, practice cold calls, and ace your civil procedure exam.